
These carved pumpkins are just really really cool :-) From a barfing pumpkin, to a death star pumpkin, to a firefox pumpkin, these jack 'o lanterns are far cooler than anything I ever created! Enjoy :-)
Hat tip: Strange Maps Blog

NARTH, the controversial National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, held its annual meeting last week in Dallas. A new article on the organizations website congratulates the participants for their "stellar presentations" of "convincing evidence that homosexuality is more fluid than fixed, and that indeed, individuals can make desired changes in their lives."I am utterly baffled that NARTH could believe that these results could be accurately summarized as "convincing evidence that [homosexual] individuals can make desired changes in their lives." In my opinion, a far more accurate rendering of the study's results would go something like this: some (actually, a minority of the sample population) individuals self-report achieving desired orientation change.source: Box Turtle Bulletin's nine-page analysis of the Jones & Yarhouse study
- 33 people reported change (from homosexual/bisexual/other to heterosexual or from homosexual to bisexual/other)
- 29 reported no change
- 8 reported “negative change” (from heterosexual/bisexual/other to homosexual or from heterosexual to bisexual/other)
- 3 reported uncertain change (moving from bisexual to other, or the reverse)
- 25 dropped out of the study
the answer to whether or not some motivated people can alter aspects of their sexual orientation through religious ministry is "Yes." (emphasis mine)This statement seems far closer to the truth than the first--although I still question the accuracy of the word "alter." All the Jones & Yarhouse study indicates is change in self-reported orientation. No objective measures of "aspects of their sexual orientation" were used.
a study that meets the high standards set by the American Psychological Association, Dr. Stanton Jones presented the results of his longitudinal, prospective study--a book just released by InterVarsity PressI'm stunned how NARTH can state (accurately) that the study has appeared in a book from an evangelical Christian publisher and in the same breath imply endorsement by the APA's peer-review process when the study has never been appeared in one of the APA's affiliate conferences or journals.

Sources close to Dobson say that within the next ten days he is coordinating an endorsement plan with the presidential campaign of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. According to a Huckabee insider in Iowa, the event would be staged in that state at a rally, followed by a bus tour across the state, and an appearance by Huckabee on Dobson's radio show, which is heard nationally.
Dobson's endorsement, according to the Huckabee source, could mean millions in fundraising to the campaign, allowing it to compete at the same level with the top tier candidates Huckabee has been inching toward in the polls after a series of strong debate and campaign appearances.
Tim Minnery, Senior Vice President for Focus on the Family, Dobson's organization, denied on Friday (November 9, 2007) afternoon that Dobson intended to endorse Huckabee in the coming days. Minnery's denial was submitted to the Spectator after Dobson received calls from other social conservative leaders inquiring about the leaked endorsement plans from the Huckabee campaign and Dobson associates. "Dr. Dobson isn't close to an endorsement of anyone in the 2008 race," Minnery wrote in an email to the editor denying there was an endorsement planned.
Contacted again by The American Spectator, those who initially spoke on background about the Dobson endorsement insisted that as of last night, plans were being put in place by the Huckabee campaign for an announcement and endorsement tour, and stood by their account.
Oh the irony. The ACLU, long considered by conservative religious folks to be the posterchild of all things wrong with America, will be defending vitriolic conservative Christian Shirley Phelps-Roper in Nebraska court this coming Monday. The AP reports:Phelps-Roper, 50, is to appear in Sarpy County Court on Monday on charges of flag mutilation, negligent child abuse, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and disturbing the peace. The charges were filed after Phelps-Roper allowed her 10-year-old son to stand on the flag while protesting at a Bellevue soldier's funeral in June.I doubt they'll get her on flag mutilation, but I'm quite interested to see what comes of the negligent child abuse charge...
Phelps-Roper's attorney, Bassel El-Kasaby, said he has asked that the case be thrown out because the charges are unconstitutional. El-Kasaby was hired by the Nebraska ACLU to represent Phelps-Roper.
NPR has some interesting coverage of the verdict of a Maryland jury ordering Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church to pay $10 million in damages to the father of a dead marine whose funeral the church picketed. It's clear everyone hates Phelps' family and his church (check out the BBC documentary The Most Hated Family in America), but is this ruling against the church just or does it infringe on their freedom of speech?This issue is not whether the church has a constitutional right to express its message; it certainly does. The much tougher issue is whether it has that right at the funeral of a fallen service member. We have public spaces and private spaces in our society, and the free speech rights that we all enjoy in our public spaces don't always give us the right to intrude into the private spaces of others. A lot will turn in these cases on exactly where the protesters assembleCheck out the full piece by clicking the link below.
There is a line, and that line will be drawn in close proximity to the funeral events. That kind of division will divide the public space and the private space. Even though what the church engaged in here does appear to fall within the realm of the is hate speech, the church has a right to engage in that hateful speech unless it invades in someone else's privacy.
A jury found that it was an invasion of privacy, and the interesting question on appeal will be whether the first amendment allows us to treat what happened here as the kind of invasion of privacy that trumps free speech rights.
...according to the book Time Has an End: A Biblical History of the World 11,013 B.C. - 2011 A.D. by Harold Camping.
I didn't see this coming. In a televised statement today, Pat Robertson stood next to Rudy Giuliani and announced his support for the former New York mayor to become the 2008 Republican presidential candidate.Civil officials have a God ordained duty to execute sodomites.What follows is a tirade that sounds remarkably like the folks over at Westboro Baptist Church. There's no possible way I could misrepresent Jim Rudd by stating he has extremist views; I think he would rather appreciate that description and the association with Fred Phelps' clan. Mr. Rudd concludes:
America is a cursed nation (John 7:49) and "defending marriage" does nothing to cut off the curse... The word of God commands that sodomites are to be executed, and God gives our civil officials the sword to do the job. Until our civil officials turn from their wicked way by administering Justice, we can only be judged with the most depraved pagan nations in history.Hat tip: Dispatches from the Culture Wars

This televangelists and televangelical couples are:Mr. Grassley said the investigation was triggered by news reports and complaints from the public and will look at whether the ministries have abused their tax-exempt status.
"The allegations involve governing boards that aren't independent and allow generous salaries and housing allowances and amenities such as private jets and Rolls-Royces," Mr. Grassley said.
"I don't want to conclude that there's a problem, but I have an obligation to donors and the taxpayers to find out more. People who donated should have their money spent as intended and in adherence with the tax code."
To those of us in a post-sexual revolution culture, convictions in pre-sexual revolution culture seem crazy. As a society examines and criticizes its assumptions about genders and familial relationships, many bizarre convictions come to light.
Ok, now this is just cool. Wikipedia now pours an almost-realtime RSS feed of edits to its pages into Google maps. The result? Wikipedia Vision. A marker moves back and forth across the globe, pinpointing the source of the most recent Wikipedia edit, and which article has been edited.